Thursday, September 24, 2026

SEC Charges Florida Man With Defrauding Law Enforcement Officers in Fake Fund Scheme

Michael Williams raised $860,000 from 18 investors, many of them police and firefighters, using fabricated trading returns from a simulated account while spending nearly half on luxury goods.

By the Family Office Real Estate Daily Desk·Thursday, September 24, 2026·2 min read
Editorial summary of reporting byWealthManagement.comOur editorial standards →
The answer · checked against WealthManagement.com

What did the SEC allege Michael Williams did with investor funds raised through Check Mate Investments CMI Capital?

The SEC charged Michael D. Williams and his business, Check Mate Investments (CMI) Capital, with defrauding at least 18 investors — many of them current or former law enforcement members — raising approximately $860,000 through fabricated trading returns. Williams spent about 45% of investor funds on personal expenses including a high-end sports car, jewelry, and vacations, while basing claimed returns of over 187% on a simulated trading account.

Key facts
  • The SEC filed a complaint in federal court in Florida against Michael D. Williams and Check Mate Investments (CMI) Capital, alleging Williams lied to investors when soliciting them to invest in two funds he controlled.
  • Williams raised approximately $860,000 from at least 18 investors between October 2023 and August 2024, according to the SEC.
  • SEC Miami Regional Office Director Stephanie N. Moot said Williams tricked investors by sending them 'cropped screenshots of graphics that showed exorbitant trading profits,' which in reality came from a simulated trading account.
  • Williams told investors his strategy generated year-over-year returns exceeding 187%, but the SEC said he never opened a brokerage account for CMI Capital and his personal trading history was consistently marked by year-over-year losses.
  • Williams used approximately 45% of total investor funds for personal expenses including credit card and mortgage payments, a high-end sports car, luxury car rentals, jewelry, vacations, and medical spa treatments, according to the SEC.
  • Williams has returned at least $375,000 of investor funds to date, largely using funds provided by his family, and agreed to a forthcoming associational bar plus disgorgement and civil penalties to be decided at a later point.
SEC Charges Florida Man With Defrauding Law Enforcement Officers in Fake Fund Scheme
Image: editorial illustration · Story sourced from WealthManagement.com

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint in federal court in Florida against Michael D. Williams and his business, Check Mate Investments Capital, alleging Williams defrauded at least 18 investors of about $860,000. Many of the investors were current or former law enforcement members, the commission said.

Williams solicited investments for two CMI funds he never incorporated between October 2023 and August 2024, the complaint said. He claimed the funds would trade stock options, crypto assets and S&P 500 equities. Williams was never registered as an investment adviser.

The SEC alleged Williams told investors he would manage the funds with little risk using a strategy that generated year-over-year returns exceeding 187%. In reality, he never opened a brokerage account for CMI Capital, the commission said. He based his claims on his personal trading history, which was consistently marked by year-over-year losses.

Williams used phone calls, texts, emails, in-person meetings and social media to solicit investors, the complaint said. Many of the law enforcement victims trusted Williams because of his work with a West Palm Beach-based police and firefighter pension plan administrator. He often asked them to refer friends and family, many of whom were not accredited investors, the SEC said.

Williams sent investors fake profits and portfolio values in monthly reports or on social media, according to the commission. He posted cropped screenshots of returns from a practice trading platform to a Facebook group chat for CMI Capital investors, the complaint said. Stephanie N. Moot, director of the SEC's Miami Regional Office, said Williams tricked investors by sending them cropped screenshots of graphics that showed exorbitant trading profits.

Williams used about 45% of the total funds for his own use, the SEC said. The expenses included credit card and mortgage payments, cash withdrawals, a high-end sports car, luxury car rentals, jewelry, luxury goods, vacations, restaurants and medical spa treatments, according to the complaint.

In August 2024, investors realized the fund returns Williams touted were from a simulated trading account and began questioning his assertions, the commission said. Williams attempted to offer repayment to some investors and has returned at least $375,000 of investor funds, largely using funds provided by his family. In settling some of the charges, Williams agreed to a forthcoming associational bar and to disgorgement and civil penalties to be decided later.

The Deployment Angle

Family Office Real Estate Daily Desk · our analysis, not the source's

The case illustrates why family offices vetting co-GP or platform capital opportunities must insist on audited performance history and third-party custody. Williams claimed returns exceeding 187% annually but never opened a brokerage account for the fund, a gap that standard operational due diligence would have caught in days.

When a sponsor's track record rests on personal trading history rather than an institutional book, family offices should require at least three years of audited statements and confirmation that client assets are held at a qualified custodian with independent statement delivery. If the sponsor resists, the conversation should end.

The reliance on affinity networks—in this case, law enforcement connections through a pension administrator—underscores the risk of reputation-by-association. Family offices sourcing deals through industry contacts should verify that the sponsor's regulatory status, entity formation and account structure are independently documented, not inferred from professional proximity.

This was a relatively small raise—$860,000 over ten months—yet 45% leaked to personal expenses before investors questioned the simulated account screenshots. For family offices considering a separate account or programmatic joint venture, that flow-of-funds opacity is the red line. Insist on monthly bank reconciliations, hard-wired waterfalls and a control account at the family office's own custodian if the commitment exceeds seven figures.

Questions this story answers

01Who did Michael Williams target in his alleged investment fraud scheme?

According to the SEC, Williams targeted at least 18 investors, many of whom were current or former law enforcement members in South Florida. The SEC said many victims trusted Williams because of his work with a West Palm Beach-based police and firefighter pension plan administrator, and he often asked them to refer friends and family, many of whom were not accredited investors.

02How did Michael Williams fake trading returns to deceive investors?

According to the SEC complaint, Williams posted cropped screenshots of returns from a practice trading platform to a Facebook group chat for CMI Capital investors, and sent investors fake profits and portfolio values in monthly reports or on social media. In August 2024, investors realized the returns Williams touted were from a simulated trading account.

03What happened to the $860,000 Michael Williams raised from investors?

The SEC alleged Williams used approximately 45% of the $860,000 raised for personal use, including credit card and mortgage payments, cash withdrawals, a high-end sports car, luxury car rentals, jewelry, luxury goods, vacations, restaurants, and medical spa treatments. Williams has returned at least $375,000 to investors to date, largely using funds provided by his family.

04Was Michael Williams registered with the SEC or any regulator?

According to the SEC complaint, Williams was never registered when he solicited investments for the two CMI Funds between October 2023 and August 2024. The SEC also noted that Williams never incorporated the two funds he solicited investments for and never opened a brokerage account for CMI Capital.

05What penalties is Michael Williams facing as a result of the SEC charges?

In settling some of the charges, Williams agreed to a forthcoming associational bar, as well as disgorgement and further civil penalties to be decided at a later point, according to the SEC complaint filed in federal court in Florida.

Original reporting
WealthManagement.com
Read the original at WealthManagement.com →
fraudsec-enforcementmanager-due-diligenceregulatory-complianceaffinity-fraud
Peer Network · By Invitation

The Thesis Exchange

Share an investment thesis in confidence. We pair you anonymously with up to two other family offices running adjacent strategies. Reviewed by Gallium's editorial team. No vendor pitch.