Direct:Target single-tenant infill acquisitions in Lower San Gabriel Valley, where direct ownership allows customization for last-mile users benefiting from port flows.

Direct:The direct ownership angle for a family office in this market could involve acquiring strategically located industrial assets to benefit from the anticipated stabilization in vacancy rates.

Direct:The direct ownership angle for a family office in this market could involve acquiring strategically located assets that benefit from the port's proximity.

Direct:The direct ownership angle for a family office in this market could involve acquiring distribution centers to capitalize on the anticipated demand from larger tenants.

Direct:The direct ownership angle for a family office in this market could involve acquiring assets in the north and northeast Denver sub-markets, where vacancy rates are improving.

Direct:Acquire infill last-mile facilities in the southeast submarket, where high-tech industrial users like Hadrian and Axon are driving tenant demand.

Direct:Target value-add acquisitions in the 50K-200K sq ft range where tenant consolidations may create discounted buying opportunities for patient capital.

Direct:Target newer-built vacant properties in North Natomas submarket, where limited new supply reduces lease-up risk and airport proximity drives tenant interest.

Direct:Target single-tenant industrial assets near the U.S.-Mexico border where Amazon recently leased space, using separate accounts to control lease negotiations.

Direct:Acquire infill last-mile properties with short-duration leases in Fairfax County for repositioning into cold storage or urban logistics uses

Direct:Target value-add acquisitions in Clark County or the northwest industrial corridor where demand fundamentals remain strongest.

Direct:Direct ownership in Las Vegas hotels could allow a family office to customize operations and respond swiftly to market changes.

Direct:Direct ownership of hotel assets in Orange County could provide family offices with control over operations and the ability to customize offerings to meet market demand.

Direct:Direct ownership in suburban hospitality assets may offer family offices greater control and customization in a challenging market environment.

Direct:Direct ownership in select hotel assets could provide family offices with control and customization to enhance performance as the market recovers.

Direct:Family offices may consider direct ownership of hotel assets in high-demand submarkets like Carlsbad-Oceanside to gain control and customization over their investments.

Direct:Direct ownership in select-service hotels may offer family offices control and customization, particularly in areas less affected by new supply.

Direct:Direct ownership of select service hotel assets could offer family offices control and customization in a market facing occupancy challenges.

Direct:Direct ownership of hotel assets in high-demand areas like Provo-Orem could provide family offices with control and customization to maximize returns.

Direct:Family offices may consider direct ownership of hospitality assets in Portland to capitalize on specific submarket strengths and enhance operational control.

Direct:Direct ownership in key hotel assets could allow a family office to capitalize on the recovery in occupancy and revenue as visitor numbers rise.

Direct:Direct ownership of hotel assets in high-demand areas like South Bay could allow a family office to capitalize on increased tourist traffic.

Direct:The direct ownership angle for a family office in this market allows for greater control and the ability to customize asset management strategies.

Direct:Direct ownership in self-storage assets allows a family office to customize operations and respond quickly to market changes in Los Angeles.