Family offices managing private wealth are adopting stricter investment criteria for real estate as global interest rates remain elevated. The institutions, which handle assets, investments and personal affairs for wealthy families, are now concentrating on properties available at significant discounts or those with leases that can be repriced quickly.
Rob Haugen, chief investment officer at Michels Family Financial and River1 Asset Management, said his firm will commit substantial capital only to "truly exceptional" projects unless it gains confidence that rates will decline. Michels Family Financial, based in Milwaukee, is targeting office buildings acquired at low prices with tenants already in place, as well as large retail properties.
Despite the challenging rate environment, large family offices continue to view real estate as an inflation hedge and are monitoring industrial property, farmland and timberland. Joel Houck, chief investment officer at HB Wealth Management, said more wealthy clients are showing interest in real estate and other tangible assets due to inflation concerns.
Houck said the inflation-hedging benefit of real estate works only when property managers can reprice leases quickly. Industrial and residential properties typically have regular rent adjustment mechanisms and limited supply, which supports rental growth, he said. Houck also advises clients to avoid real estate funds with leverage exceeding 65%.
The depreciation tax shield that real estate provides allows family offices to defer taxes on distributed income until the asset is sold, adding to the asset class's appeal.
Family investors are taking a cautious stance toward technology infrastructure such as data centers. Haugen said data center projects typically come with lockup periods of 10 to 15 years, making commitments in a high-rate environment too risky.
Mike Silverman, chief investment officer at Cresset, said his firm avoids data centers despite frequent client inquiries. Cresset views data centers as a "technology bet" rather than a "real estate bet," he said, because long-term lease security may be threatened by rapid technological change that diminishes building value.
